CourtHeath ConsultingCourtHeath Consulting CourtHeath ConsultingCourtHeath Consulting
  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our story
    • Panels & Clients
  • UN Global Compact
    • UNGC Statement
  • Resources
    • Our policies
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Documents
    • FAQ
  • Contact us +
    • Where to find us:

      CourtHeath Consulting
      Level 30, 35 Collins Street.
      Melbourne 3000

      Contact No: 04 21 167 746 0421167746

      Email: info@courtheath.com.au

      Tram: Elizabeth Street – Stop 8.

      Contact form:







        Your Name (required)

        Your Email (required)

        Subject

        Your Message

    19 Sep

    Major changes to Australian Procurement law

    Courtheath's blog
    By CourtHeath Consulting

    By Phillip Weiss

    Proposed legislation will give suppliers a more straightforward way to challenge a procurement process.

    At first this legislation will only affect the Commonwealth, but similar legislation would also be required by the States and Territories to meet Australia’s international obligations.

    Australia is negotiating entry to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement. Under that agreement Australia will have to establish or designate an impartial and independent body where suppliers can raise complaints about government procurement processes and be awarded remedies or compensation. Under the Government Procurement (Judicial Review) Bill 2017 (the Bill) the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCC) would have jurisdiction to grant an injunction or order payment of compensation or both in relation to a contravention of the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs) for a covered procurement. In general a covered procurement is when the rules in Divisions 1 and 2 of the CPRs apply.

    The FCC has a greater presence outside of the major cities and that would give suppliers in rural and regional Australia easier access to have their complaints heard.

    An essential first step would be for a supplier to make a complaint to the procuring entity. If the complaint is not resolved they can then approach the Court for an injunction or other remedy, such as compensation. The compensation available would be limited to the supplier’s costs of making the complaint and tender preparation costs.

    The Bill has been reviewed by the Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee. The committee endorsed the bill in its current form.

    In reply to submissions made to it the committee’s view was that:

    • The 10 day time limit was not too short.
    • Procurement entities will have to keep clear records of their interactions with suppliers.
    • Using the FCA and FCC is appropriate as they are accessible and cost effective.

    The committee pointed out that the legislation would be additional and not in substitution of existing mechanisms. The resources of the Office of Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise would continue to be available to small and medium businesses that may need help in lodging complaints relating to government procurement.

    One issue the committee did not address was the uncertainty in the CPRs themselves. The CPRs are the basic rules for all Commonwealth procurements and govern the way in which entities undertake their own processes. The current CPRs came into effect on 1 March 2017.

    The Joint Select Committee on Government Procurement had previously reported on the CPRs. That Committee stated that “[c]omprehensive guidelines are essential to address the current deficiencies [in the CPRs] and ensure that the implementation of the new clauses is successful.”

    If the CPRs are not sufficiently clear the right course would be to amend and improve them to make them fit for purpose. It will be interesting to see how the Courts interpret the CPRs and what weight they will give to any guidance the Department of Finance may issue.

    A concern for procurement professionals is that the legislation could:

    • place a greater administrative burden on them
    • potentially delay some procurement activities and
    • increase costs as probity practitioners and lawyers will be required more often to deal with complaints and litigation.

    In reality complaints and legal action should be rare if procurement teams have sound procurement processes in place and follow those processes.

    * * *

    IMAGE used under licence from shutterstock.com: Offices of the World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    [category courtheath's blog]

    [procurement, legislation, probity]

    CourtHeath Consulting

    CourtHeath Consulting provides expert procurement and probity advice to government and not for profit organisations. We provide specialist consulting services about procurement issues and organisational procurement operations – as well as management of simple and complex tender processes. Our probity audit and advisory services help clients meet government probity standards especially regarding conflict of interest, confidentiality, ethical conduct and corruption risks.

    Recent Posts

    • Cultural Diversity and Dialogue
    • The UNGCNA 2024 Impact Report
    • Earth Day 2025: Our Power, Our Planet
    • Spotlight on Public Sector Integrity
    • Supplier Code of Conduct: Probity Risks

    Archives

    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • August 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • May 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • June 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • March 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • Home
    • Services
    • About us
      • Our People
      • Our story
      • Panels & Clients
    CourtHeath logo
    • Blog
    • UN Global Compact
    • Resources
      • Our policies
      • Documents
      • FAQ
    Linkedin     X Social
    • CONTACT US

    CourtHeath Consulting

    Level 30, 35 Collins Street.

    Melbourne 3000

    Contact No: 0421 167 746

    Email: info@courtheath.com.au

    Tram: Spring Street - Stop no 8


    Copyright 2021 © CourtHeath Consulting · Australia. All Rights Reserved.