CourtHeath ConsultingCourtHeath Consulting CourtHeath ConsultingCourtHeath Consulting
  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our story
    • Panels & Clients
  • UN Global Compact
    • UNGC Statement
  • Resources
    • Our policies
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Documents
    • FAQ
  • Contact us +
    • Where to find us:

      CourtHeath Consulting
      Level 30, 35 Collins Street.
      Melbourne 3000

      Contact No: 04 21 167 746 0421167746

      Email: info@courtheath.com.au

      Tram: Elizabeth Street – Stop 8.

      Contact form:







        Your Name (required)

        Your Email (required)

        Subject

        Your Message

    03 Sep

    Corruption risks in post-VPS employment

    Courtheath's blog
    By CourtHeath Consulting

    Whilst government and private sector firms benefit by recruiting from one another, a recent IBAC report* has highlighted corruption risks and conflicts of interest (COI) that can arise when VPS employees take up private sector roles.

    As with other probity dilemmas, in the twilight zone between “clearly OK” and “clearly wrong”, many real life examples exist.

    A government employee who awards a tender in exchange for a promise of employment with the successful tenderer, has acted improperly. VPS employees who deliberately use their position, including access to agency information and business contacts, to improperly further their own private business interests or improve their prospects of future employment have probably crossed the line. According to the IBAC report, this scenario may be a COI under the VPS Code of Conduct, if the employee’s personal financial interests appear to influence the performance of their role.  

    On the other hand, an evaluator who coincidentally receives an unsolicited job offer from a tenderer, may not have done anything improper. There may nevertheless be an adverse perception. The adverse perception can be worse the later this occurs in a tendering process and the more senior the person’s role. If the employee receives a lump sum payment or shares, the perception can become very adverse.

    This type of COI is not an uncommon probity issue in VPS procurement. The Victorian Public Sector Commission website states:

    There is nothing unusual or necessarily wrong in having a conflict of interest. It is crucial, however, that conflict of interest is managed to protect the public interest.

    If not managed appropriately, conflict of interest can undermine confidence in the public sector and damage the reputations of organisations and individuals.

    It’s increasingly common for people to move to the private sector from the VPS. Almost 300,000 people work for the VPS through a variety of employment arrangements including ongoing and fixed term employment and, increasingly resources engaged through staffing services contracts. Overlay the relatively high rate of churn and no wonder we see former public servants of all levels in private sector roles.

    Many people who move between the VPS and private sector do so without there being any wrongdoing or concern. VPS employees are bound by confidentiality and COI obligations under the VPS Code of Conduct –  their colleagues who may be engaged through the staffing services arrangements or other contracts will be bound by the VPS Code of Conduct or similar obligations through the Victorian Government Purchasing Board Supplier Code of Conduct.

    The IBAC report acknowledges that

    … movement of people between the public and private sectors is often beneficial, as it broadens people’s experience, skills and understanding … when moving between positions, organisations and sectors, individuals will naturally leverage the skills and experience they have gained in their previous positions.

    But, to avoid COI and corruption, IBAC has recommended that consideration be given to developing VPS guidance similar to the Commonwealth’s Circular 2007/3: Post Separation Employment: Policy Guidelines, which includes the following:

    • advice on the management of actual and perceived COI and other probity issues when employees leave the APS to take up employment in fields that are aligned to their APS responsibilities
    • restrictions on public servants from post separation employment as a lobbyist
    • recognition that a key change in the nature of public sector employment is that it is no longer a “closed, entry level to retirement” career – people are moving in and out of the APS, and this, together with the widespread use of outsourcing arrangements, has made post separation employment a growing issue
    • a list of important benefits arising for the private and public sectors alike from the increasing integration between them, such as:

    – helping to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Australian industry by facilitating the transfer of skills and experience between the sectors

    – helping the private sector to better understand the policy and organisational culture within which the APS operates and to be more responsive and cooperative in providing services

    – helping the APS attract staff that might otherwise be reluctant to join if they thought that at some later stage their options for careers in other sectors might be restricted

    • common law principles that prohibit “restraint of trade” in employment (unless it can be shown that such restraint is reasonable) and legislative restrictions
    • three key risks involved when an APS employee accepts employment in a field that is aligned to his or her APS responsibilities:

    – that the employee, while still employed in the APS, would use their position to influence decisions and advice in favour of the prospective new employer

    – that the employee would reveal confidential or sensitive Commonwealth information to their new employer or provide other information that would give the new employer an advantage in dealing with the APS and/or a competitive advantage in the market generally

    – that the former employee would use their knowledge of and contacts within the APS, in other areas of the Commonwealth public sector and with the Government to lobby or otherwise seek advantage for their new employer in dealing with the Commonwealth

    • recognition that agencies are best able to manage COI at the stages when an APS employee who intends to take up a private sector appointment is still employed by the Commonwealth
    • reference to the APS Code of Conduct, which requires employees to:

    – disclose, and take reasonable steps to avoid, any real or apparent COI in connection with APS employment

    – not make improper use of:

    — inside information, or

    — the employee's duties, status, power or authority

    in order to gain, or seek to gain, a benefit or advantage for the employee or for any other person.

    • mitigations for post-separation COI risk such as:

    – re-allocation of the employee's duties

    – temporary movement to a different work area

    – taking leave until the new appointment commences.

    • a requirement for agencies to have procedures in place that:

    – help all employees to understand the importance of avoiding real and apparent COI in their work

    – require all employees to notify managers about private interests, both financial and personal, where they could present a real or apparent COI with their official duties

    • recognition that procurement and impending contracts create high risk of COI
    • distinction between  two types of information involved in the post-separation COI risk:

    – official information and “in confidence” information, protected by law and off-limits

    – information, knowledge and experience about subject matter and about how the APS operates and makes decisions that employees pick up through their responsibilities – this information is of particular interest to firms dealing with government – it’s legitimate for firms to gather the expertise that will best help it meet a client’s needs

    • reaching agreement about restrictions on post-separation employment is easier when the person joins the APS than when they resign to go to the private sector
    • it may be more convenient to restrict firms contracting with government from employing certain former public servants e.g. those involved in a tendering process.

    Until Victoria has its own guidance, VPS agencies can refer to the Commonwealth material. And, like any other COI, usual VPS COI processes apply: the employment offer should be disclosed ASAP and the resulting COI managed according to an agreed plan.




    * IBAC’s report Corruption and misconduct risks associated with employment practices in the Victorian public sector identifies corruption risks that can occur throughout the employment lifecycle, from recruitment through to an employee leaving the public sector.

    * * *

    IMAGE: Spring Street, Melbourne. By Max Goupil.

    Written by 

    Pauline Bernard.

    [category courtheath's blog]

    [

    Victorian Public Sector, Conflict of interest, IBAC

    ]

    CourtHeath Consulting

    CourtHeath Consulting provides expert procurement and probity advice to government and not for profit organisations. We provide specialist consulting services about procurement issues and organisational procurement operations – as well as management of simple and complex tender processes. Our probity audit and advisory services help clients meet government probity standards especially regarding conflict of interest, confidentiality, ethical conduct and corruption risks.

    Recent Posts

    • Cultural Diversity and Dialogue
    • The UNGCNA 2024 Impact Report
    • Earth Day 2025: Our Power, Our Planet
    • Spotlight on Public Sector Integrity
    • Supplier Code of Conduct: Probity Risks

    Archives

    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • August 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • May 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • June 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • March 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • Home
    • Services
    • About us
      • Our People
      • Our story
      • Panels & Clients
    CourtHeath logo
    • Blog
    • UN Global Compact
    • Resources
      • Our policies
      • Documents
      • FAQ
    Linkedin     X Social
    • CONTACT US

    CourtHeath Consulting

    Level 30, 35 Collins Street.

    Melbourne 3000

    Contact No: 0421 167 746

    Email: info@courtheath.com.au

    Tram: Spring Street - Stop no 8


    Copyright 2021 © CourtHeath Consulting · Australia. All Rights Reserved.